skip to Main Content

H1N1 (Swine Flu): WHO Conducting H1N1 Global Response Assessment

The WHO has elected to conduct an in-depth assessment of their management of the handling of the H1N1 pandemic.  The assessment of the global response to the pandemic H1N1 will be conducted by the International Health Regulations Review Committee (IHRRC), a committee of experts with a broad mix of scientific expertise and practical experience in public health. The members are some of the leading experts in the world in their respective fields.  The IHRRC forecast their draft report will be delivered at the WHO annual meeting May 2010.

The International Health Regulations (IHR) is an international legal agreement that is binding on 194 States Parties across the globe, including all of the Member States of WHO. The basic purpose of the IHR is to help the international community prevent and respond to acute public health risks that have the potential to cross borders and threaten people worldwide.

In January 2010, the WHO Executive Board requested a proposal from the Director-General on how to assess the international response to the pandemic influenza, and then approved her suggestion to convene the IHR Review Committee to review both the pandemic response and the functioning of the IHR. The pandemic H1N1 is the first public health emergency of international concern to occur since the revised IHR came into force. The IHR played a central role in the global response to the pandemic and so review of the IHR and review of the global handling of the pandemic influenza are closely related.

The IHR facilitate coordinated international action by requiring countries to report certain disease outbreaks and public health events to WHO so that global reporting of important public health events is timely and open. The IHR were first implemented (i.e., “entered into force”) worldwide in 2007 and the Health Assembly determined that a first review of its functioning is to take place by the 63rd World Health Assembly in May 2010.


The review has three key objectives:

  • Assess the functioning of the International Health Regulations (2005);
  • Assess the ongoing global response to the pandemic H1N1 (including the role of WHO); and
  • Identify lessons learned important for strengthening preparedness and response for future pandemics and public health emergencies.

The Committee

The IHR Review Committee is made up of approximately 29 members who have been selected from the roster of experts under the IHR structure or other WHO expert committees. The committee members represent a broad mix of expertise, practical experience and backgrounds, and includes experts from developed and developing countries. The members are some of the leading experts in the world in their respective fields. They are not WHO staff, nor do they receive funding from WHO for their contributions to the review process. Names of the committee members were made public prior to the first meeting:

List of members of the review committee

Why was the IHR formed?

In the globalized world, diseases can rapidly spread far and wide via international travel and trade. A health crisis in one country can impact livelihoods and economies in many parts of the world. Emerging infections such as an influenza pandemic are an important cause of such events. However, other public health emergencies such as chemical spills, leaks and dumping, or nuclear melt-downs may similarly have global effects.

The IHR are not specific for any one disease or group of diseases but generally aim to limit interference with international traffic and trade while ensuring public health through the prevention of disease spread. The IHR define the rights and obligations of countries to report public health events, and establish a number of procedures that WHO must follow in its work to uphold global public health security. The IHR also require countries to strengthen their existing capacities for public health surveillance and response.

If you want to hear the initial results of the three day meeting, click on the link below to hear the press conference.

Related Posts
Filter by
Post Page
Business Continuity Management
Sort by

H1N1 (Swine Flu): Bird Flu Returns to Asia; First Confirmed Human Case in Hong Kong since 2003. Philippines On Alert, Screening At Airports

Bird flu has returned in Asia with a reported case in Hong Kong. A 59-year-old woman in the city contracted H5N1


H1N1 (Swine Flu): Two human infections with swine origin influenza A (H3N2) in the United States (Wisconsin and Pennsylvania)

Last week CDC reported 2 human infections with a novel swine origin influenza A (H3N2) virus in the United States


H1N1 (Swine Flu) Mutant Gene D222G Linked To Fatal Cases Might Have Disabled The Clearing Mechanism Of Lungs

A new study in the November issue of Virology suggests that suggests that the mutant virus, known as D222G, could


H1N1 (Swine Flu): CDC Lowers Annual Death Toll from 36,000 to 24,000

Last week, the CDC substantially lowered its often-quoted estimate of how many people die in a typical influenza


H1N1 (Swine Flu): The World Enters the Post Pandemic Phase

Today, Dr. Margaret Chan, the Director General of the World Health Organization announced that Phase 6 of the H1N1


H1N1 (Swine Flu): Wanna Lose Sleep At Night??? Read About Reassortment with H1N1 Pandemic Strain and H5N1 (Bird Flu)

The latest Journal of Virology, had an interesting article that has the ability to send chills down your spine…”High


This Post Has 4 Comments
    1. Thanks for your post – you are so right! The report doesn’t say much does it?!?!?! Was the management successful? Well, yes and no. Yes in the sense that communication was effective, health care systems around the world worked together for the most part well, vaccine production started pretty early and frankly, since the flu was rather benign for the most part, the overall deaths were low. However there were a lot of things that didn’t work. WHOs pandemic levels were confusing (they were meant to note global spread not local impact), our detection systems missed lots of possible clues (especially in the US) and the initial plans by many governments and businesses needed a lot of modification. It however overall was a great test and learning opportunity. It was our first pandemic since 1968 and that was like an eternity ago. We did OK – hopefully next time we will do better – as long as it isn’t a long time off. We seem to have short attention spans these days. Be well, Regina

  1. I personally want to take note of this specific
    post, “H1N1 (Swine Flu): WHO Conducting H1N1 Global Response Assessment « Business Continuity Planning
    & Emergency Management” on my personal page. Do you care in the event I
    reallydo? Regards ,Irma

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Back To Top
×Close search